The Middle East is becoming more unstable by the hour. Two of the factors which have caused it to remain at a low to medium simmer over the last 40 years have been the strong backing of the United States for Israel, coupled with nominally pro-western (or at least heavily secularized) governments in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt. However the rapid weakening of our pro-Israel position by President Obama is causing the fanatical religious sects of Islam to gain increasing power in the formerly secular Islamic states.

A binding agreement between one or more Powers foreign to one another (i.e. States) is by definition, principle, and historical application a treaty - regardless of the name. So a question to be asked is this: if a sitting President takes it upon himself to engages us in a treaty and said treaty results in a weakening of our military position (specifically nuclear) in a time when the Middle East is becoming more unstable and more nuclear, and publicizing the fact that we will not engage in a nuclear response even under chemical or biological attack, is it not arguable that this in fact gives comfort and aid to the enemy? 

In the face of an ideology that has an avowed world-view which is antithetical to that of the United States of America and when the adherents of that ideology see themselves as being at war with us, is it not more than foolish to deny and ignore that fact? Regardless of whether we see ourselves as being in a war, the fanatical sects of Islam do in fact see themselves as being at war with us. With us being all non-Islamic states, but especially at this time the United States of America.

A traitor is one who essentially pledges themselves to a cause, by word and/or deed, then turns against that cause. Treason however takes that a step further and takes an active role against the State. In this case the State being the Federal Union or the United States of America. 

If a biological or chemical attack were to follow, would it be right to hold the Senators voting to ratify and the President accountable on charges of treason?